Deck | Creator | Record | Best Finish |
---|
Abzan Beanstalk , Abzan Midrange , Abzan Roots , Domain Ramp , Domain Zur Overlords , Golgari Analyst , Golgari Beanstalk , Golgari Demons , Golgari Midrange , Jund Beanstalk
Pillage the Bog ranks #191 out of approximately 406 cards in raw efficiency (top 47%).
Multi average: 67.3%
Performance compared to other Multi cardsBased on our comprehensive multi-metric analysis, Pillage the Bog is a decent card with average performance in the current meta.
Recommended number of copies: 1
Performance Efficiency: 17.86 (Win rate × Top 8 rate ÷ Mana value)
At 2 mana, the average win rate in the format is 74.7%. Pillage the Bog has a win rate of 71.4%, making it 4.4% worse than other 2-mana cards.
Card Name | Type | Deck Count | Win Rate | 1st Places |
---|---|---|---|---|
Starfall Invocation | Sorcery | 5 | 80.0% | 4 |
Render Inert | Sorcery | 9 | 79.0% | 6 |
Archangel of Wrath | Creature — Angel | 6 | 78.6% | 4 |
Scrollshift | Instant | 6 | 78.6% | 4 |
Seized from Slumber | Instant | 6 | 78.6% | 4 |
Clifftop Lookout | Creature — Frog Scout | 7 | 60.0% | 4 |
Overlord of the Mistmoors | Enchantment Creature — Avatar Horror | 24 | 49.0% | 7 |
Leyline Binding | Enchantment | 22 | 47.0% | 6 |
Overlord of the Boilerbilges | Enchantment Creature — Avatar Horror | 17 | 46.1% | 2 |
Pyroclasm | Sorcery | 17 | 46.1% | 2 |
Cards that perform better with Pillage the Bog than they do on average. A positive synergy score indicates stronger performance together.
Card Name | Type | Mana | Decks | Win Rate Together | Win Rate Apart | Synergy Score |
---|
Archetype | Deck Count | % of Archetype | Win Rate |
---|---|---|---|
Golgari Midrange | 31 | 4.0% | 25.8% |
Jund Beanstalk | 16 | 72.7% | 45.1% |
Abzan Beanstalk | 13 | 38.2% | 64.5% |
Domain Ramp | 5 | 29.4% | 44.8% |
Domain Zur Overlords | 5 | 0.4% | 22.5% |
Statistic | Description | Formula |
---|---|---|
Win Rate Impact | How much this card increases or decreases the win rate of decks that include it, compared to the average deck in the format. | (Win rate of decks with this card) - (Average win rate of all decks) |
Top Table Win Rate | A weighted win rate that gives more significance to performance in higher tournament placements. First place finishes count for 2x, with diminishing weight down to 8th place. | ∑(wins × placement_weight) / ∑((wins + losses) × placement_weight) |
Meta Trend | Shows if the card is performing better or worse in the most recent period compared to earlier periods. Positive values indicate improving performance. | (Win rate in recent half of time period) - (Win rate in earlier half of time period) |
Confidence Factor | A measure of statistical reliability based on sample size. The progress bar indicates how confident we are in the statistics (with larger sample sizes providing higher confidence). | log10(Number of decks + 1) |
Average Copies | The average number of copies of this card included in decks that use it. | ∑(Copies in each deck) / (Number of decks) |
Card Synergy Score | Measures how well this card performs with other cards compared to their individual performance. | (Win rate together) - (Average of individual win rates) |
Raw Efficiency | Win rate points per mana invested. Higher values indicate better returns on mana investment. | (Win rate) / (Mana value) |
Relative Efficiency | How efficient this card is compared to the average card of the same mana value. | ((Win rate) / (Format average win rate for same mana)) / (Mana value) |
Performance Efficiency | Combined metric that accounts for win rate, tournament success, and mana investment. | (Win rate × Top 8 placement rate) / (Mana value) |
Game Impact Factor | A measure of how much this card affects game outcomes, based on win rate adjusted by its deviation from the format average. | Win rate × (1 + (Win rate - Format average) / 100) |
Color Differential | How this card's win rate compares to the average win rate of other cards of the same color. | Win rate - Average win rate for same color |
All statistics are calculated using tournament data from the selected time period. Sample sizes below 10 decks may not provide statistically significant results.